POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS • POLICY COMMUNICATIONS • HUMAN RIGHTS LAW • ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS •

Bridging Climate Justice, AI Governance, and Feminist Tech

Policy Communications

Human rights law

ETHICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS

I help companies, executives, philanthropic funders, and organizations navigate the intersection of AI governance, climate justice, feminist technology, and human rights policy, and understand who current frameworks are failing to protect

30+ ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTED

The frameworks exist. The gaps are by design.

AI governance that names affected communities but never reaches them
AI governance that names affected communities but never reaches them
Climate finance that flows North while climate breakdown lands South
Corporate accountability standards that apply in Brussels and nowhere else
National security exceptions that erase rights exactly where they're most needed
Philanthropic resources that miss the frontline organisations doing the hardest work

the work

10 years of movement communications. 1 rigorous, public argument about who power keeps leaving behind, how, and why.

125+

Countries of grassroots climate work

The communities AI governance keeps forgetting are the ones I work with.

Leading communications across 125+ countries through Global Greengrants Fund's community-led advisory network means I do not theorise about who AI frameworks fail to protect. I work with them. That proximity is what makes the governance analysis specific rather than abstract.

Scale teaches you what frameworks miss at the margins.

Coordinating narrative strategy across 460+ organisations in Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action (GAGGA) showed me exactly where corporate accountability standards, bilateral donor frameworks, and governance processes break down, long before I started applying the same analysis to AI. The pattern is the same. The communities bearing the cost are the same.

460+

Orgs in feminist climate alliance

Service / 01

01

AI Governance Research

Building a rigorous public argument about why international AI governance frameworks are architecturally incapable of protecting criminalized and legally unprotected populations. Research spans EU AI Act analysis, UN process monitoring, and corporate accountability frameworks including CSDDD and UNGPs.

4500+

Readers and growing

AI Governance Research

Building a rigorous public argument about why international AI governance frameworks are architecturally incapable of protecting criminalized and legally unprotected populations. Research spans EU AI Act analysis, UN process monitoring, and corporate accountability frameworks including CSDDD and UNGPs.

4500+

Readers and growing

AI Governance Research

Building a rigorous public argument about why international AI governance frameworks are architecturally incapable of protecting criminalized and legally unprotected populations. Research spans EU AI Act analysis, UN process monitoring, and corporate accountability frameworks including CSDDD and UNGPs.

4500+

Readers and growing

Service / 02

02

Policy Communication

A decade of translating complex governance architecture for audiences who did not start with the framework, bilateral donors, multilateral policymakers, feminist funders, movement organisations. Developed narrative frameworks that shifted how Global Affairs Canada, Dutch MFA, FCDO, and Irish Aid think about feminist climate finance.

450+

Organisations in GAGGA feminist climate alliance

Policy Communication

A decade of translating complex governance architecture for audiences who did not start with the framework, bilateral donors, multilateral policymakers, feminist funders, movement organisations. Developed narrative frameworks that shifted how Global Affairs Canada, Dutch MFA, FCDO, and Irish Aid think about feminist climate finance.

450+

Organisations in GAGGA feminist climate alliance

Policy Communication

A decade of translating complex governance architecture for audiences who did not start with the framework, bilateral donors, multilateral policymakers, feminist funders, movement organisations. Developed narrative frameworks that shifted how Global Affairs Canada, Dutch MFA, FCDO, and Irish Aid think about feminist climate finance.

450+

Organisations in GAGGA feminist climate alliance

Service / 03

03

Climate Justice & Feminist Philanthropy

Currently leading external narrative strategy and influencing at Global Greengrants Fund, a global climate philanthropy operating across 125 countries. Building the narrative architecture that connects grassroots climate solutions to the philanthropic resources they deserve.

125+

Countries through Global Greengrants Fund

Climate Justice & Feminist Philanthropy

Currently leading external narrative strategy and influencing at Global Greengrants Fund, a global climate philanthropy operating across 125 countries. Building the narrative architecture that connects grassroots climate solutions to the philanthropic resources they deserve.

125+

Countries through Global Greengrants Fund

Climate Justice & Feminist Philanthropy

Currently leading external narrative strategy and influencing at Global Greengrants Fund, a global climate philanthropy operating across 125 countries. Building the narrative architecture that connects grassroots climate solutions to the philanthropic resources they deserve.

125+

Countries through Global Greengrants Fund

Service / 04

04

Feminist Technology

Co-leading Comms for a Cause (C4AC Labs), a feminist technology organisation building consent-first digital infrastructure for activists in high-risk contexts. Co-founder of DisQo Collective, a digital civic platform for Disabled, Queer, and Neurodivergent activists in South and Southeast Asia.

100+

Membership applications from activists across 12 countries

Feminist Technology

Co-leading Comms for a Cause (C4AC Labs), a feminist technology organisation building consent-first digital infrastructure for activists in high-risk contexts. Co-founder of DisQo Collective, a digital civic platform for Disabled, Queer, and Neurodivergent activists in South and Southeast Asia.

100+

Membership applications from activists across 12 countries

Feminist Technology

Co-leading Comms for a Cause (C4AC Labs), a feminist technology organisation building consent-first digital infrastructure for activists in high-risk contexts. Co-founder of DisQo Collective, a digital civic platform for Disabled, Queer, and Neurodivergent activists in South and Southeast Asia.

100+

Membership applications from activists across 12 countries

My Argument

Mainstream AI governance

State as duty-bearer

Capacity gap framing

Principles-level commitments

Global North regulatory templates

Communities named, then failed

State as potential violator

Structural choice framing

Architecture-level analysis

Constitutive exclusions named precisely

Communities named, then protected

Mainstream AI governance

State as duty-bearer

Capacity gap framing

Principles-level commitments

Global North regulatory templates

Communities named, then failed

State as potential violator

Structural choice framing

Architecture-level analysis

Constitutive exclusions named precisely

Communities named, then protected

Mainstream AI governance

State as duty-bearer

Capacity gap framing

Principles-level commitments

Global North regulatory templates

Communities named, then failed

State as potential violator

Structural choice framing

Architecture-level analysis

Constitutive exclusions named precisely

Communities named, then protected

MY APPROACH

From primary source to public argument.

01

Read everything

The actual text. The footnotes. The appendices. EU AI Act Article 2(3). Paragraph 37 of A/HRC/62/48. The session transcripts.

02

Find the gap

What is named and then not acted on. What is absent by design rather than by accident. What the framework cannot say without dismantling itself.

03

Make the argument

Precisely, publicly, with citations. In language that reaches both policy audiences and the communities the analysis is actually about.

04

Start again

Every answer opens three more questions. The argument grows by following what the evidence reveals, not by deciding in advance where it ends.

ABOUT

The person behind the work

Dalit, queer, non-binary, and neurodivergent. LLM in International Human Rights Law. A decade in feminist movement communications across 125+ countries. Currently Director of Communications and Influencing at Global Greengrants Fund.

FAQ

What is the state-as-violator problem in AI governance?

International AI governance frameworks position states as the primary duty-bearers responsible for protecting populations from AI-enabled harm. But when the state is itself deploying AI surveillance against activists, defenders, and criminalized communities, that entire protection architecture fails structurally. The problem is not implementation — it is architectural.

What communities does your AI governance research focus on?

Women human rights defenders, LGBTQI+ activists in criminalising jurisdictions, and environmental defenders whose states deploy AI surveillance against them. These three populations share a common structural problem: the governance frameworks that claim to protect them are built around an assumption of state good faith that does not hold for their specific situations.

Where can I read your published work?

Alliance Magazine, Repro Uncensored, and LinkedIn. The most comprehensive pieces are the investigative research on Meta's surveillance architecture (Repro Uncensored, July 2026) and the full analysis of the UN's first Global Dialogue on AI Governance (LinkedIn, July 2026).

Are you available for speaking, consulting, or collaboration?

Yes. I am open to conversations about AI governance research, policy communications, feminist technology, and climate justice. Reach me at suman@commsforacause.org

Let's have the hard conversation.

I am always excited about everything AI governance, policy communications, feminist technology, and climate justice.

Let's have the hard conversation.

I am always excited about everything AI governance, policy communications, feminist technology, and climate justice.

Let's have the hard conversation.

I am always excited about everything AI governance, policy communications, feminist technology, and climate justice.